Disclosure: We earn a commission if you make a purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you. This doesn’t influence our scoring — we research tools honestly and score transparently.
Quick Verdict
Otter and Fireflies are the two strongest general-purpose AI meeting assistants — both transcribe meetings, generate summaries, and integrate with Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet. The difference is in focus: Otter prioritises real-time collaboration (live transcription during meetings, in-meeting comments, highlight sharing), while Fireflies prioritises post-meeting workflows (CRM integration, task extraction, conversation intelligence analytics).
Choose Otter if: you want real-time transcription during meetings with live collaboration features for team note-taking.
Choose Fireflies if: you want stronger post-meeting automation — CRM updates, task extraction, and conversation analytics across your team’s meetings.
Otter Overview
Otter.ai is an AI meeting assistant focused on real-time transcription and collaboration. Its signature feature is live transcription during meetings — participants see the transcript building in real-time and can highlight, comment, and add action items as the meeting progresses. Otter integrates with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, sending a bot to join and transcribe meetings automatically.
Our full review scores Otter 84/100.
Fireflies Overview
Fireflies.ai is an AI meeting assistant focused on post-meeting intelligence. It transcribes meetings, generates AI summaries and action items, and integrates deeply with CRM and project management tools (Salesforce, HubSpot, Notion, Asana, Slack). The conversation intelligence features — tracking talk-to-listen ratios, sentiment, topics discussed — make it particularly strong for sales and customer success teams.
Our full review scores Fireflies 83/100.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Real-Time Collaboration
Otter’s live transcription experience is the best in the category. During meetings, participants can view the transcript in real-time, add highlights, insert comments, and flag action items. This turns meetings into collaborative documents rather than recordings you process later.
Fireflies focuses on post-meeting processing. Its real-time capabilities are more limited.
Winner: Otter (significant advantage for in-meeting use)
Post-Meeting Automation
Fireflies excels at what happens after the meeting ends. Automatic summaries, action item extraction, and deep integrations with CRM tools (Salesforce, HubSpot) and project management tools (Notion, Asana, ClickUp) turn meeting transcripts into actionable workflows.
Otter offers summaries and action items but with less integration depth for post-meeting automation.
Winner: Fireflies (stronger CRM and project management integrations)
Conversation Intelligence
Fireflies provides analytics across your team’s meetings: talk-to-listen ratios, sentiment tracking, topic extraction, and custom trackers for specific keywords or phrases. Sales teams use this to analyse call performance and identify coaching opportunities.
Otter offers basic analytics but less depth in conversation intelligence.
Winner: Fireflies (purpose-built for team analytics)
Transcription Accuracy
Both tools produce accurate transcriptions on clean audio with clear speakers. Both struggle with heavy accents, crosstalk, and poor audio quality — a category-wide limitation. In controlled comparisons, accuracy is close enough that other factors matter more than transcription quality alone.
Winner: Tie
Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Otter | Fireflies |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yes (300 min/mo, 30 min/meeting) | Yes (limited credits) |
| Pro/Individual | $16.99/user/mo | $18/user/mo |
| Business/Team | $30/user/mo | $29/user/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom |
Both are comparably priced. Otter’s free tier is more generous (300 minutes/month).
Who Should Choose Otter?
Choose Otter if real-time collaboration during meetings matters. If your team wants to annotate, highlight, and discuss the transcript as it is generated — rather than reviewing recordings after the fact — Otter’s live experience is unmatched.
Who Should Choose Fireflies?
Choose Fireflies if post-meeting automation and team analytics matter. If your workflow depends on meeting insights flowing into CRM systems, project management tools, and Slack channels automatically — Fireflies integrates more deeply.
Our Recommendation
Otter (84/100) for teams that want real-time meeting collaboration. Fireflies (83/100) for teams that want stronger post-meeting automation and conversation intelligence.
FAQ
Is Otter or Fireflies more accurate? Both produce comparable transcription accuracy. Neither is meaningfully better than the other in controlled comparisons.
Which is cheaper? Both are comparably priced ($16.99-$18/user/month for individual plans). Otter’s free tier is slightly more generous.
Can I use both? Yes, but most teams choose one to avoid duplicate meeting bots joining the same call.
Which is better for sales teams? Fireflies — the CRM integrations and conversation intelligence analytics (talk ratios, sentiment, topic tracking) are purpose-built for sales call analysis.
Which has a better free plan? Otter’s free tier (300 minutes/month) is more generous than Fireflies’ limited credit-based free tier.
Structured Data
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Tool Name | Otter |
| Category | AI Meeting Assistants |
| Overall Score | 84/100 |
| Price From | $16.99/user/month (Pro) |
| Free Plan | Yes (300 min/mo) |
| Best For | Teams wanting real-time meeting transcription and collaboration |
| Affiliate Link | [AFFILIATE: otter] |
| Last Reviewed | April 2026 |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Tool Name | Fireflies |
| Category | AI Meeting Assistants |
| Overall Score | 83/100 |
| Price From | $18/user/month (Pro) |
| Free Plan | Yes (limited credits) |
| Best For | Teams wanting post-meeting automation with CRM and PM tool integrations |
| Affiliate Link | [AFFILIATE: fireflies] |
| Last Reviewed | April 2026 |
Last updated: April 2026